Privacy Stewardship

Framework revised March 2026

systematicspark operates with a core commitment to respecting the details you share with us. This document explains how we receive, work with, protect, and eventually retire the specifics you provide when engaging our web design services. Rather than describe technologies used on this site, we focus here on organizational responsibility toward the identifying elements entrusted to us. For information about browser mechanisms and session tools, please review our separate cookie disclosure.

What We Receive and Why It Matters

When you reach out to discuss a project, request a consultation, or enroll in one of our upcoming courses, certain specifics naturally emerge. These might include your full name, email address, phone contact, and company affiliation if relevant. We don't gather this material simply because forms exist—we need it to respond meaningfully, schedule conversations, send course materials, and ultimately deliver the design work you're commissioning.

Payment transactions introduce another layer. When you move forward with a service agreement, our payment processors obtain billing coordinates and transaction identifiers. We never directly handle card numbers or sensitive financial instruments—those remain with specialized third parties whose sole business revolves around secure payment handling. What reaches us are confirmation records and receipts necessary for accounting accuracy and contract fulfillment.

Your interaction with our platform generates operational traces—access timestamps, device characteristics, browser configurations, and network identifiers. These aren't collected to profile behavior but to maintain system stability, troubleshoot technical issues, and detect irregular access patterns that might signal security threats. Think of them as infrastructure logs rather than surveillance records.

Service-Driven Intake Points

  • Project inquiry forms capture contact coordinates and preliminary design requirements
  • Course registration systems record enrollment details and learner preferences
  • Email correspondence naturally accumulates communication history and project evolution
  • Client portals track file exchanges, revision cycles, and milestone approvals
  • Payment systems generate transaction records and billing documentation
  • Support channels create ticket histories and resolution documentation

How We Work With What We Hold

The specifics we receive serve defined operational purposes—none of them mysterious or concealed. Primary among these is service delivery itself. Can't exactly design your website without knowing who you are or how to send the finished work. Course participants need their learning materials routed to the correct addresses. Project updates have to reach the people who commissioned them.

Communication flows both ways. We'll reach out regarding project timelines, schedule adjustments, course announcements, or occasionally share insights about web design trends relevant to your industry. You maintain full authority to decline these updates—we're not interested in filling inboxes with unwanted noise. Every message includes straightforward opt-out mechanisms.

Behind the scenes, administrative necessities emerge. Financial records must reconcile with delivered services for tax compliance and business accounting. Legal obligations occasionally require documentation preservation. If disputes arise—though we work hard to prevent them—having accurate records protects both parties. Quality improvement depends on understanding which aspects of our service resonate and which fall short, though we never use individual details for research without explicit permission.

Internal Access Framework

Not everyone at systematicspark can view everything. Project managers access client communication histories and design specifications. Financial staff work with billing records but don't need design files. Technical support teams can examine system logs when troubleshooting but won't review project content unless specifically addressing a technical issue. Access follows necessity—if your role doesn't require certain information, you simply can't reach it through our systems.

When Information Moves Beyond Our Systems

We don't sell client details. Period. That said, certain operational realities require controlled external disclosure. Payment processors must receive transaction data to complete financial exchanges—that's just how digital commerce functions. Cloud infrastructure providers host our platforms, meaning they technically hold the data even though contractual agreements prevent them from using it for any purpose beyond providing storage and computing resources.

Occasionally a client requests integration with external platforms—maybe you want project files automatically synced to your Dropbox, or course completion certificates sent through your learning management system. These connections require sharing specific details with those third parties, but only after you've explicitly authorized the integration. We won't connect your information to external services without clear instruction.

Legal demands represent another transfer category. If Taiwanese authorities issue valid legal requests for information related to criminal investigations or regulatory compliance, we're obligated to respond. We scrutinize such requests carefully and provide only what's legally required, nothing more. Similarly, if systematicspark were ever acquired or merged with another entity, client records would transfer as part of business assets—though any such transaction would be announced well in advance with options for data removal if desired.

Cross-Border Considerations

Our primary operations center in Taichung, Taiwan, but digital infrastructure doesn't respect geographic boundaries. Cloud servers might physically sit in other jurisdictions even while remaining under our contractual control. We select service providers carefully, prioritizing those with strong privacy frameworks and robust security practices regardless of their physical location. Data doesn't leave our control simply because it crosses borders—contractual obligations travel with it.

Your Authority Over What We Hold

You're not powerless once information reaches us. Several mechanisms exist for exercising control over your details. Want to see exactly what we have? Request a complete export and we'll compile everything within a reasonable timeframe—typically two weeks, occasionally longer if records span multiple archived systems. Notice something incorrect? Point it out and we'll make corrections assuming you can verify your identity and the change doesn't conflict with regulatory record-keeping requirements.

Deletion requests get more complicated. If you've never actually engaged our services and just made an inquiry, removal is straightforward—we simply erase the inquiry records. But if we've completed paid work together, financial regulations require retaining transaction documentation for specific periods regardless of deletion requests. Design files you've paid for remain yours; we can remove our copies but can't erase your ownership of the work product.

Object to specific uses? Let us know. If we're sending occasional design trend updates and you'd rather not receive them, one click stops future messages. If you believe we're handling your details in ways inconsistent with this framework, raise the concern and we'll investigate immediately. Some processing activities can't be stopped without ending the service relationship entirely—can't really provide web design services without maintaining project files—but you're always free to walk away.

Practical Exercise Points

  • Access requests receive response within 14 business days with comprehensive data export
  • Correction requests process immediately once identity verification completes
  • Deletion follows tiered approach: marketing lists purge immediately, service records follow retention schedules
  • Objection to processing requires case-by-case evaluation balancing legal obligations against preferences
  • Portability requests deliver structured data formats suitable for transfer to alternative providers
  • Restriction requests allow temporary processing limitations during dispute resolution

Protection Philosophy and Remaining Vulnerabilities

Security isn't absolute—anyone claiming perfect protection is either lying or dangerously naive. What we can offer is layered defense designed to make unauthorized access prohibitively difficult while acknowledging that determined, well-resourced attackers might eventually succeed. Our approach combines encryption during transmission, access authentication, regular security audits, and prompt patch management.

Data moves between your browser and our servers through encrypted channels—think of it as a sealed envelope rather than a postcard. Once information arrives, it sits behind authentication barriers requiring verified credentials before access grants. We don't use simple password schemes; multi-factor authentication protects administrative access, and session timeouts prevent abandoned terminals from becoming security vulnerabilities.

But risks persist. Phishing attacks could trick team members into revealing credentials. Zero-day vulnerabilities might exist in software we depend on before patches become available. Physical security failures at data centers, though unlikely, remain theoretically possible. Natural disasters could destroy backup systems. We prepare for these scenarios through redundancy, insurance, and incident response plans, but can't eliminate the risks entirely. If a breach occurs, affected individuals receive direct notification within 72 hours along with specific guidance on protective steps.

Retention Duration Framework

Nothing stays forever. Marketing inquiry records that don't convert to active projects purge after 18 months. Active project files remain accessible throughout the service relationship plus two years following completion—gives you time to request changes or reference previous work. Financial records follow Taiwanese tax requirements: seven years from transaction date. Email correspondence archives after three years unless ongoing project relevance maintains it. System logs rotate monthly unless flagged for security investigation. Course completion records persist indefinitely unless you specifically request removal, since they serve as credential verification.

Questions, Concerns, and Escalation Routes

This framework attempts clarity but can't anticipate every scenario. When questions arise, direct contact produces faster resolution than formal procedures. Our privacy point of contact isn't a separate department—it's the same team handling your projects, just focused on data handling questions rather than design specifications.

Office: 403 Taiwan, Taichung City, West District, Section 2, Taiwan Blvd, 536號區地下一樓A

If our response fails to satisfy your concerns, Taiwanese regulatory authorities provide external oversight. You can lodge complaints with relevant data protection bodies, though we'd appreciate the opportunity to address issues directly before escalation. Most concerns resolve through straightforward conversation once both parties understand the specific situation.